Deployed troops battle for child custody

By Pauline Arrillaga, AP National Writer
Sat May 5, 5:22 PM ET

She had raised her daughter for six years following the divorce, handled the shuttling to soccer practice and cheerleading, made sure schoolwork was done. Hardly a day went by when the two weren't together. Then Lt. Eva Crouch was mobilized with the Kentucky National Guard, and Sara went to stay with Dad.

A year and a half later, her assignment up, Crouch pulled into her driveway with one thing in mind — bringing home the little girl who shared her smile and blue eyes. She dialed her ex and said she'd be there the next day to pick Sara up, but his response sent her reeling.

"Not without a court order you won't."

Within a month, a judge would decide that Sara should stay with her dad. It was, he said, in "the best interests of the child."

What happened? Crouch was the legal residential caretaker; this was only supposed to be temporary. What had changed? She wasn't a drug addict, or an alcoholic, or an abusive mother.

Her only misstep, it seems, was answering the call to serve her country.

Crouch and an unknown number of others among the 140,000-plus single parents in uniform fight a war on two fronts: For the nation they are sworn to defend, and for the children they are losing because of that duty. Read more
here.

4 comments:

  1. Oh... this never even crossed my mind. It's heartbreaking.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I don't know much about American law, but that's just horrible. I'll have to find out what the law is in Australia ..

    ReplyDelete

I love to get comments and usually respond. So come back to see my reply. You can click here to see my comment policy.